The joke
Four hundred agents, one person, and the task left over for the person is the one nobody can put a number on. The pause before "morale" does all the work.
The irony
It's how a lot of AI plans treat people: as the leftovers. Whatever the software can't do yet goes to the human, and someone calls it the human touch. But a team of 400 agents doesn't have morale. It has outputs, failures and somebody who has to answer for them.
So what?
Our papers argue the opposite of leftovers. Software and AI can do the work, but people keep the deciding: setting intent, holding authority over what is bought, answering for the result and changing their mind. On the Periodic Table of Work, every Element has a Nucleus, a named person, even when AI does all of it. That isn't morale. That's the job.
If agents do the doing, what should the one human on the team actually be doing? Tell us in the comments, or respond to the paper.
Read more
Respond
Add your view.
Academics, practitioners, sceptics: tell us where this is right or wrong. Mark reads every response, and the best are published here with your name and role, with our reply.